ABSTRACT
Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is complex multisystem disease. After 4 weeks of persistent symptoms, it is termed as Long COVID-19. Long COVID-19 causes a decrease in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In this study, it was aimed to determine which symptoms were associated with lower HRQoL in Long COVID-19 in this study. Material(s) and Method(s): This cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary research hospital. Patients who have positive RT-PCR results at least 28 days and at most 180 days ago were selected for the study. Online survey was applied to 266 patients who had positive PCR test results for COVID-19. The EuroQoL 5D-3L scale was used to measure the HRQoL as a dependent variable. Socio-demographic features and symptoms were assessed by the survey as independent variables. Due to heteroscedasticity, a robust standard error regression analysis was conducted to make inferences on the effects of persistent symptoms on HRQoL. Result(s): Of the total 266 participants, 163 were females (63.3%). The mean age was 41.2 +/- 11.8 years. One hundred forty-two patients (53.3%) did not report any ongoing symptom. Female gender and lower education level as socio-demographic variables, visual problems and myalgia as persistent symptoms were identified as risk factors for reduced HRQoL in Long COVID-19 patients. Discussion(s): Long COVID-19 patients experience lower levels of HRQoL, especially those with visual problems and/or myalgia. Interventions to raise the HRQoL of Long COVID-19 patients should first target visual problems and myalgia.Copyright © 2023, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: There are scant data on long-term outcomes of treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with a combination of advanced therapies, including after de-escalation. Method(s): We identified patients with IBD at a tertiary center who began therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) in combination with another advanced therapy (biologic or JAK inhibitor) between 2016 and 2020 and examined their outcomes through 6/1/22. We defined biochemical remission as CRP, 5 mg/L and calprotectin < 150 mcg/g, and endoscopic remission as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 or simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (CD) 0. Short-term outcomes of this cohort were previously reported. Result(s): Fourteen patients with a median of 322 (IQR 251-322) weeks of follow up were identified. 10 had ulcerative colitis, 3 CD, and 1 indeterminate colitis. VDZ was combined with tofacitinib in 9 patients, ustekinumab in 3 and adalimumab in 2. Median time on combination therapy was 94 weeks (IQR 17-133). Eight patients achieved objective remission (3 biochemical, 5 endoscopic), 1 changed combination with subsequent endoscopic remission, 2 had primary non-response, 1 had secondary non-response, 1 stopped within 1 month due to reported adverse effect (paresthesia), and 1 lacked follow-up data. Eight patients de-escalated to a single agent, 4 at physician direction and 4 due to insurance denial. Before de-escalation, 6 had objective remission (2 biochemical, 4 endoscopic). After de-escalation, 3 patients maintained objective remission (2 biochemical, 1 endoscopic), 3 had disease flare, of which 1 required colectomy, and 2 lacked data. All 3 patients with disease flare had de-escalated following an insurance denial. Two patients remained on combination therapy through follow up: 1 has endoscopic remission after changing one drug of their combination and 1 has ongoing moderate endoscopic disease despite combination therapy. There were 2 infections requiring hospitalization (rotavirus, C. difficile), and 8 non-serious infections (5 mild SARS-COV-2, 1 peristomal cellulitis, 1 pneumonia, 1 sinus) while on combination therapy. Conclusion(s): In long-term follow up of this small cohort, there were no new signals on effectiveness or safety of combining advanced agents. De-escalation to a single agent was tolerated in half of patients with follow-up data;all patients who flared following de-escalation had adjusted therapy due to insurance denial. More data is needed to inform de-escalation decisions.
ABSTRACT
History: We present a 15-year-old right hand dominant high school swimmer with no significant past medical history, who complains of right elbow pain along the distal biceps' tendon for a 2 months. Pain was insidious in onset, sharp, intermittent, and described as a 0 to 6 out of 10. The patient has been swimming more frequently over the last few months to prepare for competition and noticed progressive pain with swimming. He went on vacation and then was diagnosed with a COVID-19 infection and took an additional 2 weeks off due to fatigue. He returned to sport without re-integration and increased his swimming intensity to 1 to 2 hours daily, which worsened his pain. Performing the butterfly and breaststroke provoke symptoms and cessation of activity reduces the pain. Denies pain at rest. He took Advil which did not reduce his pain. Denies acute trauma, prior injuries, or paresthesias. Physical Exam: Inspection of right elbow: no swelling or signs of discoloration. Palpation: Tenderness at the distal biceps tendon but can hook the tendon without pain. No shoulder or wrist tenderness. Active Range of Motion: Elbow extension 0 degrees, elbow flexion 130 degrees, supination and pronation normal. Normal shoulder and wrist ROM. Muscle strength: 5/5 grip, wrist extension, and wrist flexion. Pain elicited with resisted elbow flexion at the distal humerus. Maneuvers: pain with distal humerus squeeze. Negative Maudsley and negative Cozen test. Differential Diagnosis: 36. Distal Biceps Tendonitis/Tear 37. Stress Reaction of the Distal Humerus 38. Medial Epicondyle Apophysitis 39. Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans 40. Radiocapitellar Plica Syndrome Test Results: x-ray right elbow: AP and Lateral views indicate no abnormalities to the bones, alignment, or soft tissue structures. MRI right elbow No IVCON: Biceps tendon intact. There is periosteal edema and endosteal aspect marrow edema along the medial aspect of the distal diaphysis and metaphysis of the humerus. Several small foci of increased cortical signal. No fractures, joint effusion, or chondral defects. Findings comparable to Fredrickson grade 4a distal humerus diametaphysis stress injury. Final Diagnosis: Right Elbow Supracondylar Grade 4a Stress Reaction. Discussion(s): Actives that involve repetitive motion are susceptible to overuse injuries. Cases of upper extremity stress reactions in swimmers have been documented along the inferior angle of the scapula, upper ribs, and olecranon. Stress reactions along the distal humerus in swimmers is not well documented. This pathology has been seen in baseball players, cricket bowlers, and tennis players. In swimming, the butterfly technique requires significant endurance and athletic strength. During a sprint, fast synchronized upper extremity revolutions occurring up to 60 cycles perminute counterforcewater surface area friction leading to excessive loading forces even at 50 meter distances. Outcome(s): The patient was withheld from upper body work outs and swimming for 6 weeks. VitaminDand Calcium levels were drawn revealing a normal calcium level (10.2), but a vitamin D level of 28.1. Patient was started on 600 IU of Vitamin D and 1300 mg of Calcium daily. The patient started a return to swim program and returned to full competition at 7 months post presentation. Follow-Up: At 6 weeks, started an upper extremity low impact non-aquatic physical therapy program. Then a slow progressive return to swimming was initiated at 50% effort for 4 weeks. At 10 weeks, a return to sport plan including 200 m all strokes except butterfly, progressed to 250 m at week 2, 300 m at week 3, and 350 m at week 4. Finally, initiated speed work in =0 to 100 m increments and elbow loading workouts.
ABSTRACT
Background: With the COVID-19 vaccine now available, there have been occasional reports of post-vaccination neurological complications. Case presentation: In this report, we present a case of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) that developed one month after the patient received the second dose of BIBP COVID-19 vaccine (SARS-CoV-2-Vaccine [Vero Cell] Inactivated). The patient presented with itching, numbness in the hand and right side of the face, as well as nausea, vomiting, and hiccups. Brain MRI revelead lesions in the area postrema, medulla, and bilateral hypothalamus, which are typical of NMOSD. Serum antibodies to anti-AQP4 and anti-MOG were negative. Conclusion(s): The pathogenesis of NMOSD development after vaccination is still unknown. NMOSD is generally aggressive and disabling, it is important for the neurologist to be attentive to the highly variable clinical presentation after COVID-19 vaccination for early diagnosis and effective treatment.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Case Report: This is a 50-year-old man that presented to the ED complaining of generalized weakness and acute loss of ability to ambulate which has been progressing for a month. Patient began having left arm and leg weakness, which started in his fingertips of his left upper extremity and soon moved proximally to upper left arm. Symptoms then progressed to right upper and lower arms. Symptoms further continued to progress making the patient bedridden. On presentation, CT head showed a C1/C2 subluxation possibly chronic without significant focal soft tissue swelling. CT cervical spine showed C1-C2 subluxation, possibly chronic. MRI of brain was unremarkable pre and postcontrast without focal findings or abnormal enhancement and showed redemonstration of the C1-C2 subluxation as described on CT scan. MRI of cervical spine showed at the level of C1 there is spinal canal stenosis. However, there is no direct pressure upon the cord/medulla. Upon evaluation, patient had significant motor weakness and required maximal assistance for movement. Patient was moreover noted to have flaccidity of muscles associated with weakness with no bulbar weakness. Patient had no difficulty in breathing or with speech. A lumbar tap was performed which showed elevated protein, WBC, and glucose. Upon further investigation, patient stated that he received his (3rd dose) of the Moderna Vaccine for Covid-19 about a month before the onset of symptoms and felt fine. Two weeks later, he began experiencing subjective fevers, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fatigue that lasted for a week and then self-resolved. Approximately another two weeks later is when patient began noticing his neurological symptoms. Possible Guillain-Barre Syndrome post Campylobacter Jejuni (C. Jejuni) infection vs. post Covid-19 vaccine induced GBS was suspected at this point and patient was started on Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG). Stool cultures were collected for C.Jejuni which came back negative. Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel PCR Feces also came back negative. Patient was discharged to a rehab center and planned to receive another round of IVIG for 5 days. Conclusion(s): Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) is a rare immune-mediated neurological disorder affecting peripheral nerves and nerve roots, that presents as acute sensorimotor neuropathy starting with distal paresthesia that progresses to weakness of legs and arms, noteably, flaccid paralysis. GBS has several triggers namely infections such as C. jejuni, cytomegalovirus, M. pneumoniae, Epstien-Barr virus and Zika virus. There has also been several case reports and studies that have shown increased incidence of GBS vaccines such as influenza vaccine. Furthermore, there has been several studies that have linked GBS to COVID-19 vaccine. With COVID-19 cases continuing to persist, and increasing advocacy for vaccination against the disease, GBS should be considered as very rare but possible side effect of the vaccine.
ABSTRACT
Background: During the era of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, various neurological syndromes were reported during or after the infection. Fortunately, efforts were made to successfully develop various vaccines with high efficacy and safety. Despite the promising results of those vaccines, they are too novel to be fully understood. Here we are shedding light on a neurological case presentation that may be attributed to one of the COVID-19 vaccines. Case presentation: A 23-year-old male patient with no prior comorbidities presented with quadriparesis and numbness that were clinically and electrophysiologically consistent with Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS). The condition started 10 days after the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Moreover, MRI of the brain and spinal cord has shown evidence of non-specific central demyelination. Despite the radiological finding, the patient is not fulfilling the diagnosis of a known demyelination disorder and the lesions regressed on follow-up. Since no better explanation or trigger could be found, a post-vaccination immune-mediated reaction was considered. Conclusion(s): We still cannot assume the certainty of the causality association between the vaccine and the neurological presentation. Meanwhile, we suggest vigilance for cases of GBS or myelitis following vaccination for Covid-19 and that post-vaccination surveillance programs ensure a statistically significant tool to prove or dispsrove the causality.Copyright © 2022 The Authors
ABSTRACT
Background: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, vaccination has been considered as an important measure against it. Side effects have always been an inseparable component of vaccination, which in this study, Sinopharm vaccine, its side effects and the differences of their manifestation amongst men and women have been investigated. Objective(s): This study aimed to compare the side effects of the Sinopharm vaccine among men and women working in some medical centers in Tehran, Iran. Method(s): This cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study on 890 healthcare workers of 7 medical centers in Tehran within 2 months, from late June to late August 2021. The samples were selected by the complete enumeration method, and the required data were collected using a questionnaire. Only those who received the Sinopharm vaccine at least 10 days before the study were included. Result(s): Of 890 participants, 22.96% and 77.30% were women and men, respectively, and 65.8% of women and 78.1% of men were in the age range of 20-29 years. It was revealed that 74.75% of women and 26.16% of men had at least one side effect. The incidence of at least one side effect was significantly higher in women than in men (P<0.001). It was also found that 12 side effects were significantly higher in women than in men. Most men and women had side effects within the first 24 h after vaccination. There was no significant difference in taking therapeutic measures to reduce or minimize the post-vaccination complications between men and women;however, 9.4% of men and 27.2% of women reported a decline in their ability to perform daily activities as they were unable to do their everyday tasks the day after vaccination which was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001). Conclusion(s): The results showed that the occurrence rate of side effects after receiving the Sinopharm vaccine was significantly higher in women than in men. Moreover, women were significantly less able to perform daily routines than men.Copyright © 2022, Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Background Vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 have been a topic of political, social, and medical intrigue since the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. The vaccine side effects have been relatively mild to date, with few observed systemic effects. Case presentation A 69-year-old previously healthy female presented with symptoms of asymmetric bilateral lower and upper extremity weakness 2 days after vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. MRI of the cervical spine revealed a non-compressive myelitis extending from C3-4 to T2-3. Common known causes of transverse myelitis were ruled out by diagnostic techniques. Conclusions Transverse myelitis is a rare autoimmune disorder that has been shown to have a temporal association with vaccination in the past. With a progressively partisan societal view on vaccinations, it is important for clinicians to remain vigilant on documenting potential associations without encouraging fear of causation.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s)
ABSTRACT
Background Management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and evidence of disease activity during treatment with cladribine tablets represents a challenging point. Objectives To report a patient with highly active multiple sclerosis (HAMS) who has been early switched from cladribine to alemtuzumab owing to tumultuous clinical and radiological activity Methods A single retrospective case report. Results. Treatment with alemtuzumab has led to a complete suppression of disease activity without any evidence of infections or acquired autoimmune diseases. Conclusion Our report suggests that an early switch from cladribine to alemtuzumab, may be safe and efficacious in selected HAMS cases.Copyright © 2022 The Authors
ABSTRACT
Studies about headaches associated with acute ischemic stroke in patients suffering from migraine were limited, and therefore we present a clinical case of central post-stroke pain (CPSP) in a 47-year-old woman with migraine and lacunar infarcts in the medulla oblongata and also possible mechanisms of CPSP in patients with migraine. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed lacunar infarction in the medulla oblongata on the right (vertebral artery basin) and a single focus of gliosis in the parietal lobe on the right. Magnetic resonance angiography of cerebral vessels showed the fetal type of structure of both posterior cerebral arteries. This clinical case is a complex clinical situation of a combination of secondary headaches (post-stroke) in a patient with a primary headache (migraine), which was successfully treated by the combined administration of first-line drugs for the treatment of neuropathic pain in a patient with lacunar infarcts in the medulla oblongata. The treatment of CPSP is a difficult task due to the insufficiently unexplored mechanisms of development, the most effective approaches are those aimed at reducing the increased excitability of neurons.Copyright © 2023, Indian Association of Biomedical Scientists. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Although rarely, vaccines can stimulate the immunological mechanisms underlying immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. in patients with COVID-19 there is also evidence that high titers of autoantibodies, with variable clinical relevance, can be detected. Method(s): We describe the case of a 71-year- old lady diagnosed with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) in 2010 with paraesthesia, myalgia, eosinophilia and severe asthma. After induction of remission, the patient has shown regression of the vasculitis but persistence of the uncontrolled asthma. For this reason, since February 2019 she started Mepolizumab 100 mg/month. In December 2020 she tested positive for the SARS-CoV- 2 virus, manifesting a mild form then she tested negative in January 2021. In April 2021 she was vaccinated with a single dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. After about 10 days, she started to complain arthromyalgia and after a week of gait alteration, paraesthesia, dyspnoea and worsening cough associated with chest pain. Blood tests showed an increase in creatinephosphokinase (CPK 955 U/L) and hypereosinophilia (4.3x10
ABSTRACT
Background & Objective: The late-term neurological effects of COVID-19 are not fully understood yet. Herein, we aimed to determine if COVID-19-related acute and late-term neurological symptoms exist in the patient group that differs from the general population during the pandemic period. Methods: Two hundred fifty patients with a history of COVID-19, whose treatments were completed at least one month before enrollment, were examined together with a control group consisting of 150 individuals that lived in the same socio-cultural environment during the same period. A survey that included questions about possible neurological symptoms that might be related to the COVID-19 infection was completed in both groups. Results: The patient and control groups were mostly similar regarding the neurological symptoms in the pre-pandemic period. The control group did not report any new symptoms except ageusia during the pandemic period. Whereas a number of neurological symptoms such as headache, ageusia and anosmia, difficulty in thinking and planning, forgetfulness, clumsiness of one or both hands, dizziness, unsteadiness, numbness in both hands and feet, and neuropathic pain occurred during the infection. Neurological symptoms, except headache and unsteadiness, prolonged to the late-term with a decreased prevalence. Conclusion: The emergence of new neurological symptoms during the pandemic in those with COVID-19 disease, unlike the control group, suggested that these symptoms are related to the infection itself. © 2023, ASEAN Neurological Association. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 is a viral infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 that primarily targets the respiratory system. COVID-19 may be followed in some patients by post-COV-ID-19 syndrome, fatigue, anxiety, and musculoskeletal pain. These symptoms may be associated with other symptoms, resulting in a constellation of symptoms consistent with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Two patients were evaluated at the rheumatology outpatient clinic for diffuse persistent musculoskeletal pain after COVID-19 infection. Patients presented with generalized musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, headache, hand paresthesia, and non-restorative sleep. General examination and various laboratory investigations, including autoimmune profile and radiological investigation, were normal. After examining eighteen tender points, both patients fulfilled the 1990 ACR classification criteria for FMS. Post-COVID-19 FMS should be considered during the management of post-COVID-19 syndrome to alleviate pain and prevent worsening of symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The year 2020 was the most challenging period due to the havoc caused by the outbreak of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Scientists and researchers all around the world have endeav-ored every possible approach to find solutions in context to therapeutics and vaccines to control the spread of this life-threatening virus. The acceleration instigated by the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 and its mutated strains has leveraged the use of numerous platform technologies for the development of vaccines against this unfathomable disease. Vaccines could play an important role in miti-gating the effects of COVID-19 and reducing the ongoing health crisis. Various innovative plat-forms like proteins, nucleic acids, viruses, and viral vectors have been exploited to fabricate vaccines depicting almost 90% of efficacy like BNT162b2, AZD1222, Ad5-nCoV, etc. Some of these vaccines are multipotent and have shown potent activity against newly emerged malicious strains of SARS-CoV-2 like B.1.351 and B.1.1.7. In this review article, we have gathered key findings from various sources of recently popularized vaccine candidates, which will provide an overview of potential vaccine candidates against this virus and will help the researchers to investi-gate possible ways to annihilate this menace and design new moieties.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.
ABSTRACT
One of the many challenges facing the department during the COVID-19 pandemic was how to provide follow-up safely for Mohs surgical patients. With the need to practice social distancing and avoid unnecessary face-to-face (F2F) follow-up, we felt the system could be improved to ensure patient and staff safety. We created, reviewed and adapted a new system to follow-up on patients. We designed a questionnaire that was sent out to patients 3 months postprocedure. This included questions on aesthetic and functional outcomes, and postoperative complications, including bleeding and infection. Recording these outcomes is a requirement for all Mohs surgical patients, outlined by the British Society for Dermatological Surgery. Information collected via the questionnaire allowed us to identify those who required further follow-up and those who could be discharged. A patient was felt to be suitable for discharge if they reported no postoperative complications, their scar bothered them 'a little' at most and they had no functional complications besides paraesthesia. Otherwise, patients were invited for medical photography and an appointment was arranged for them, either by telephone, or if necessary, F2F. Patients were given the option to request a consultation even if they did not meet the criteria for one. Data were collected for 131 patients who had Mohs micrographic surgery between April 2020 and July 2020. Sixty-six per cent did not require follow-up as defined by the criteria. Eighty-nine per cent of patients found the questionnaire 'acceptable' or 'somewhat acceptable'. Feedback from staff has been positive and the questionnaire continues to be our first step in follow-up. Patients are informed of this new format at the time of surgery. Our next step is to identify factors that predict the requirement for review so these patients can have a suitable appointment scheduled. We intend to review the process after the pandemic, as while this approach is considered acceptable in the current climate, we understand that it may be less so once the pandemic is over. We have demonstrated a novel approach to the follow-up of Mohs surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our data suggest that two-thirds of postoperative reviews may not be required and propose a sustainable method to identify these cases. This is significant, not only in relation to the pandemic, but in the long term. Appointments should be reserved for a clinical need to ensure efficient use of clinicians' time.
ABSTRACT
Background: There has been lot of speculation around the possible side effects associated with COVID vaccination and incidence of facial palsy is one of them. Bilateral facial palsy is less likely to be idiopathic as compared to unilateral facial nerve palsy and warrants further investigations to find any secondary cause. COVID 19 infection and the vaccinations for the same are also included in the unique list of differentials. Case report: We report an interesting case of bilateral rapidly sequential facial nerve palsy following the administration of COVID vaccination that showed subsequent improvement. We provide literature review to report the current incidence of same, secondary to the vaccination as well the infection itself Case presentation: Following the introduction of COVID 19 vaccine, there have been reports of various cranial nerve involvement including lower motor neuron type facial paresis. Bilateral facial palsy is less likely to be idiopathic as compared to unilateral palsy(23% vs 70%) and requires further work up to determine the etiology before determining to be idiopathic. Unilateral facial palsy(FP) has been reported in the Phase I and II trials for Pfizer and Moderna vaccine, with a total of 7 cases reported in these initial trials. To date, there is no direct evidence that these vaccines have increased the incidence of facial palsy as compared to adverse events reported with other vaccines or compared to COVID 19 infection itself. We report a unique case of bilateral lower motor neuron type facial palsy noted in a young male within hours of receiving the vaccine that later improved with treatment. Reports of simultaneous bilateral facial palsy after vaccine are rare with only few cases reported to date in literature. Conclusion(s): In conclusion from current available literature, we would like to postulate that though there is a risk of facial nerve palsy following the vaccination, it is comparable to the risks associated with any other vaccinations and not been higher than the non-vaccinated population. The overall risk is higher with the actual COVID 19 infection itself as compared to the vaccine.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious condition that can present none or one or more of these symptoms: fever, cough, headache, sore throat, loss of taste and smell, aches, fatigue and musculoskeletal pain. For the prevention of COVID-19, there are vaccines available including those developed by Pfizer, Moderna, Sinovac, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. Recent evidence has shown that some COVID-19-vaccinated individuals can occasionally develop as a potential side effect Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), a severe neurological autoimmune condition in which the immune response against the peripheral nerve system (PNS) can result in significant morbidity. GBS had been linked previously to several viral or bacterial infections, and the finding of GBS after vaccination with certain COVID-19, while rare, should alert medical practitioners for an early diagnosis and targeted treatment. Here we review five cases of GBS that developed in different countries after COVID-19 vaccination.Copyright © 2021
ABSTRACT
Covid immunization commenced on 2nd Feb 2021 in Pakistan and as of 7th Sep 2021, over 84 million vaccine doses were administered in Pakistan, of which 72% procured by the government, 22% received through Covax and 6% were donated. The vaccines rolled out nationally included: Sinopharm, Sinovac and CanSinoBIO (China), AstraZeneca (UK), Moderna and Pfizer (USA), Sputnik (Russia), and PakVac (China/Pakistan). About half of the eligible population in Pakistan (63 m) had received at least one dose of Covid vaccine as of Sep 2021. Pakistan National Pharmacovigilance Centre (PNPC) in coordination with WHO, MHRA and Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) established pharmacovigilance centers across Pakistan. The Covid vaccine AEFIs in Pakistan were mainly reported via NIMS (National Immunization Management System), COVIM (Covid-19 Vaccine Inventory Management System), 1166 freephone helpline and MedSafety. There have been 39,291 ADRs reported as of 30th Sept 2021, where most reported after the first dose (n = 27,108) and within 24-72 h of immunization (n = 27,591). Fever or shivering accounted for most AEFI (35%) followed by injection-site pain or redness (28%), headache (26%), nausea/vomiting (4%), and diarrhoea (3%). 24 serious AEFIs were also reported and investigated in detail by the National AEFI review committee. The rate of AEFIs reports ranged from 0.27 to 0.79 per 1000 for various Covid vaccines in Pakistan that was significantly lower than the rates in UK (~4 per 1000), primarily atrributed to underreporting of cases in Pakistan. Finally, Covid vaccines were well tolerated and no significant cause for concern was flagged up in Pakistan's Covid vaccine surveillance system concluding overall benefits outweighed risks.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease, targeting the central nervous system, rarely associated with vaccination. Case report: We report a case of a 47 year-old healthy woman who presented, ten days after the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine AstraZeneca (Vaxzevria), with back pain, tetraplegia, urinary retention, dysarthria and dysphagia. The patient was diagnosed NMOSD. She underwent intravenous-corticosteroids, vein-Immunoglobulin and plasma-exchange without significant improvement . Conclusion(s): The absence of any possible related conditions, the temporal relation with anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, suggest that, in our case, NMOSD may be due to the cross reaction from Vaxzevria.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s)
ABSTRACT
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a syndrome that resembles to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Platelet factor 4 (PF-4) reacts to a vaccine component resulting formation of immune complex that stimulates an autoimmune reaction triggering platelet consumption causing thrombus formation and producing thrombotic events. When suspected is important to confirm for make a correct anticoagulation management to avoid complications related to unfractioned and low weight heparins use. In this report we describe a case of acute limb ischemia secondary to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (Astrazeneca, Cambridge, UK)Copyright © 2022